Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.

!
!
!

Office Location

  • Pittsburgh Office

    Address

    The Grant Building, 310 Grant Street,
    Suite 1515,
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

Choose a location to review

Adamczyk Law Offices L.L.P. locations:

Ratings & Reviews

Showing 4-star reviews and above
  • 5.0/5.0

    I had a really positive experience working with Mary Adamczyk at Adamczyk Law Offices during my amicable divorce. From the start, Mary made what could have been a stressful process feel manageable and much less overwhelming. She’s a great ...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    Mary has been very personable and understanding, and experiensed in my case, to the point of anticipating how the other side will respond and was very helpful in moving it forward. I highly recommend her and her team.

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    My experience working through my case with attorney Tara Sease has been tremendous. From the beginning her communication in explaining complex legal issues combined with her razor sharp knowledge of family law was outstanding. I highly reco...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    We are in the thick of our custody case. That said, we'd be lost without our friends at Adamczyk Law Offices. Mary and her team has been with us from the outset and we could not imagine having anyone else standing by our side!

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    It was a great pleasure working with this farm, its owners and its staff. I really appreciated the professionalism and passion in the personal relationships that were established. Anthony

    — Client

Strategy-Differences Between Legal Custody and Physical Custody Cases

Physical custody is the physical contact each parent has with the child. Shared custody contemplates frequent and continuing contact with the child and access to both parents on the part of the child.

Legal custody is the legal right to make major decisions affecting the best interest of the child including but not limited to medical, religious, and educational decisions. Shared legal custody provides both parents with the ability to make such decisions regardless of the physical custody or the distance the parents live apart.

To have shared legal custody, it is necessary that the parents have an amicable relationship only in that they can sufficiently isolate their personal conflicts from issues involving the children.

A court will not provide legal custody to one parent lightly at the exclusion of the other as the benefits of shared parental decision-making are presumed to a great extent. Indeed, the perceived benefits of shared legal custody often outweighs judicial expediency meaning that a court will often require the parties to continue to battle in court, litigating one legal decision after another even if the parties are tired of the same and even if that raises the hostility of the parties toward one another.

The key focus therefore, is how the children would be harmed or benefited by keeping the status quo of shared legal custody. This can break the deadlock. It requires however, a keen focus on the issue over a significant period of time, providing example after example of how the other parent’s legal decision making is harming the child in addition to repeatedly being unable to come to joint legal decisions.

In that vein, testimony from disinterested, extra familial sources is most desired if not required to carry the day when such a tough standard needs to be met. In other words, the Father says this, Mother says that approach rarely leads to the clarity required for any judge to decide to override the presumption that shared legal custody is more beneficial.